20 |
THE
APOLOGY OF AL KINDY. |
|
was mistaken in calling him a Jew,1
and citing the authority of Abul Faraj and Ibn Abi Oseiba
for regarding him as a Mussulman, he mentions three
considerations which might be urged against this view.
First: In the catalogue of his writings there
is none relating to the Coran or to Islam. Second:
Al Kindy was one of the translators of Aristotle, familiar
with Greek and Syriac; and men of that stamp were mostly
Christians. Third: In the "Bibliothque Impriale"
there is a MS. (257), entitled, "A Defence of the Christian
Religion" (apparently identical with our Apology), written
in Syriac characters, but in the Arabic language, the
author of which is named Ycub Kindi.
Of these objections (continues de Sacy) the
last alone merits attention; but it may be met by these
counter-considerations. In the preface the author is
not named. The work is only said to have been written
by a person attached to the court of Al Mmn, a Christian
of Kindian descent. It is called "The Treatise of Al
Kendy, the Jacobite."2
It is most likely by a misunderstanding, or with the
view of increasing thereby the value of the work, that
it has been ascribed to the authorship of Ycb Kindy.
This suspicion acquires greater force, as in the catalogue
of Syrian writers, written by Ebed Jesu, we find a certain
Kendi named as the author of a religious
|
|
|
ITS
AGE AND AUTHORSHIP. |
21 |
|
treatise; and the Kendi in questionthe
same, without doubt, as the writer of our Syrian MS.
(257), or at least whose name has been assumed as suchlived,
according to an historian cited by Assemanus, about
890 A.D. (280 A.H.), a date to which it is little likely
that Yacub Kendi survived.... For the rest we may suppose
that Kendi, in pursuit of his philosophical studies,
had embraced opinions opposed to Mahometan orthodoxy,
and that this led to his faith being suspecteda
thing which has occurred to many Christian philosophers,
and among the Jews happened to the famous Maimonides.1
But this Kendi mentioned by
Ebed Jesu, whoever he was, could not possibly have been
our Apologist, for he flourished towards the end of
the third century of the Hegira, whereas the Apology
(as I hope to establish below) was certainly written
during the reign of Al Mmn, near the beginning of
that century. The passage from Assemanus, referred to
by de Sacy, consists of a note on chapter cxlii. of
Ebed Jesu's Catalogue (in Syriac verse) of Christian
authors. The verse and note are as follow:
[VERSE.]- CANDIUS fecit ingens volumen
Disputationis et Fidei.
[NOTE.]---Candius,
, Ebn Canda, hoc est Candiae filius; who flourished under
the Nestorian Patriarch Joannes IV., A.D. 893. Others
refer the authorship to Abu Ysuf Ycb ibn Ishc al
Kindi; but he, according to Pocock and Abul Faraj, was
a Mahometan. ...But the Candius whom Ebed Jesu mentions
was a
|
|
|