|
CHAPTER IV
God as Atoner
i. General Considerations
We have frequently pointed out, and the remark cannot be too often made,
for the point is absolutely cardinal, that the minute you leave the purely
physical category and enter the moral one, that moment everything becomes
changed. The centre of gravity being altered, the whole system shifts, and our
thought must undergo a corresponding modification or be guilty of the most
serious inconsistencies and errors. Now the physical category is concerned
with the mutual relations of inanimate things, or the relation of thinking
beings with inanimate things, such as the action of a player on the ball, or
the action of a falling stone upon a person. It will be seen that such
relations do not go beyond the sphere of the mechanical. They have, in
themselves, nothing to do with the moral.
But the minute you enter the moral sphere, that is, that which
concerns the reciprocal relations of moral beings, animate, conscious,
rational, you find that the simple judgement concerning, for example, strength
and weakness, has to be tremendously modified. In the physical sphere, for
example, |
|
CREATOR, INCARNATE, ATONER |
53 |
|
the question of relative strength can be settled by a tug, by a
display of muscular force, by a decisive impact. But how ridiculous it would
be to assert that moral questions can be so settled; or that when you wish to
assert your moral superiority over somebody else, or to win him morally, you
can do so by a display of superior physical force! The idea is absurd. On the
contrary, the means you employ may seem, in the physical sphere, to be sheer
weakness. At all events, moral means are very numerous and very different and
delicate and complicated, while physical means are always simple and the same
in character, because they have no other criterion than physical force, which
is always calculated according to purely mathematical laws.
The cardinal mistake of Islam, as we have seen, and the cardinal point of
difference between it and Christianity is that the former conceives the
relations between God and man to fall wholly within the physical category
(with the result, of course, that it makes men things, not persons);
while Christianity insists that men are persons, and that the relation between
them and their Creator must be fundamentally moral. The forces, therefore,
that God exerts on man will not be purely physical in character, a contest of
strength with strength; nor yet merely psychical, as though it were a contest
between a strong intellect and a weak one; but moral. And from this the
profoundest differences spring between what Islam regards as befitting |
|