|
Al-Ghazali into the mouth of God, 'These to bliss and I care not; and these
to the Fire, and I care not.' But, in all seriousness we ask, is this more
likely to improve our theology, or turn us into atheists forthwith? In these
fatal words Muslim theology finally showed its hand, and we may truly say that
it is impossible for us to love such a God as this, or indeed to owe Him any
allegiance, for we feel that a righteous man on earth is more richly and nobly
endowed than such a God in heaven.
To return then. Philosophy and revelation are at one in saying that God
experiences and manifests what can only be described as wrath, pity, love,
sorrow, in relation to sinful, rebellious man. And all these things are all
aspects of the same thing. Wrath, for example, is not the wrath of an offended
law-giver or exasperated law-administrator, but the wrath of a righteously
indignant Father and the terrible offended purity of a perfectly holy Being.
Illustrations on earth would be the righteous wrath of a father whose son
brought disgrace on his name by an act of treachery towards himself; or the
terrible indignation of a perfectly truthful man at some instance of ignoble
deceit in his friend; or the withering anger of a perfectly pure woman at some
evil suggestion made her by an impure mind. Is there not in such cases wrath,
wrath that burns like a furnace, wrath that makes the offender feel blasted,
and desire to sink beneath
|
|
CREATOR, INCARNATE, ATONER |
59 |
|
the ground and fly away into darkness? How much more then the
wrath of God! But notice that in all such cases it is a purely moral
emotionthe experience and manifestation of a perfectly moral Being, not the
merely external wrath of an incensed monarch, nor the irritation of a thwarted
administrator, still less the merely physical, mechanical vengeance of an
almighty machine of whose working man has run somehow foul; but the still more
terrible and burning wrath of a Holy One. Love only adds an element to its
intensity. And is not this the true interpretation of the wrath of God all the
way through the Bible as interpreted through Christ, that the force exerted on
the impure and untruthful in the awful Day of Judgement itself will be not
essentially different from the purely moral force exercised here on earth in
the examples we have already suggested? The same fire of love-holiness, which
will make some glow on that day, will be to others the fires of hell.
So much for wrath. It is only because our own psychological
capability is so limited that we are forced to give separate names for what
are really only aspects of the same thing in God, and talk of love, pity,
sorrow, as though they were different and even conflicting emotions. We can
perhaps only experience them successively, yet even in us they may be all
essentially related. One can imagine a mother feeling wrath, pity, love and
sorrow; if not all at once, still in essential relation |
|