|
diseases. Would it, therefore, be consistent with
the goodness and wisdom of God to enjoin a fast which
in many cases destroys health, that best of man's earthly
blessings, whilst its moral object of self-restraint
might be obtained in other ways not endangering health?
Nor is this all; for we have to consider the question
from yet another point of view. It is certain that Christianity
claims to be a universal religion, divinely intended
for all men, and equally suited to all the nations of
the earth. As, therefore, Islam assumes to be a religion
superior to Christianity, it ought to be better adapted
to the varying circumstances of mankind than the system
it seeks to displace. But what is actually the case
with regard to the institution in question? Every one
at all acquainted with geography knows that within the
tropics days and nights are equal all the year round,
but that in the temperate and arctic zones their respective
lengths vary so much that, e. g. in some localities
the day may last four or six times as long as the night,
and vice versa. Now as the Muslims have to fast during
the Ramadan from sunrise to sunset, it must follow that,
whilst they within the tropics had only to fast about
twelve hours, those living in higher latitudes (e.g.
in Stambul and further north) would have to do the same
for sixteen or twenty hours: but how could this be consistent
with the perfect equity of God? We know, |
|
|
moreover, that about the 67th degree north latitude
the day lasts about one month, about the 69th two, and
about the 73rd three months, i.e. one, two, or three
months intervene between a sunrise and the next sunset.
Now if the inhabitants of these northern latitudes were
to carry out the Muhammadan rule respecting the Ramadan
fast, by abstaining from all eating and drinking for
only a single such day, the simple consequence would
be, death from starvation, long before the time had
arrived to say the midday prayer. From this it is clear
as noon day that the existing rules of the Ramadan fast
are completely inapplicable to a whole portion of the
human family , whilst it is a matter of fact, that in
those very regions there are already thousands who confess
the Christian religion, without finding in it any precept
the observance of which would be certain death to them.
It is therefore demonstrated, that so far from being
in this particular superior to Christianity, Islam could
not exist at all in its present form in vast northern
countries, from the simple reason that the first Ramadan
would cause the death of all its faithful observers.
But would it be consistent with the wisdom of God to
enforce a law on man so obviously inapplicable to the
whole race? Shall we believe that the all-wise God made
a mistake by giving a law which in many countries could
not be observed; or shall we believe that Muhammad made
a mistake |
|