|
sin.' Besides retaliation in case of murder, the
Qur'an seems also to approve of private revenge for
any minor injuries, in the following passage, 'And whoever,
in making exact reprisal for injury done him, shall
again be wronged, God will assuredly aid him' [Suratu'l-Hajj
(xxii) 59] . Such teaching cannot but foster a harsh
and vindictive spirit towards one another, instead of
that noble spirit of kindly forbearance and love recommended
in the gospel. Whilst, therefore, in regard to the duty
we owe our fellow-men, the gospel is characterized by
pure love; and the Torah by strict justice, the Qur'an
seems to expose itself in some measure to the charge
of injustice and cruelty. This appears to be felt, and
tacitly admitted, by Muslims themselves; for even, professedly
Muhammadan Governments, such, e.g. as that of the Osmanlis,
do not think of carrying out such cruel laws as those
prescribed in the following verses of the Qur'an: 'The
recompense of those who war against God and His apostle,
and go about to commit disorders on the earth, shall
be, that they shall be slain, or crucified, or have
their hands and feet cut off on opposite sides, or be
banished the land' [Suratu'l-Ma'ida (v) 39]. And again
in verse forty-two: 'As for the thief, whether man or
woman, cut ye off their hands in recompense for their
doing.'
5. Slavery.
We have seen above (p. 26) that the Old Testament tolerated
and recognized slavery, although it |
|
|
considerably mitigated its hardships, and placed
the slaves under the protection of the public laws,
whilst we found the whole spirit and tendencies of Christianity
to be opposed to it, and calculated, wherever it can
exercise its legitimate influence, to bring about its
entire abolition. Here, therefore, we have to ask the
question: 'Does Islam assume a diviner, i.e. more generous
and benevolent aspect as regards that most degraded
class of men, the slaves, than Christianity?' History
answers 'No,' emphatically: on the contrary, it is a
fact that to this moment slavery remains undisturbed
in every country under Muhammadan rule, Muslims buying
and selling not only non-Muslims, but even their brethren
in the Faith, especially the Negroes, as they buy and
sell cattle; and that never yet has the religion of
the Qur'an produced in any place an amount of philanthropy
and generosity sufficient to effect the general emancipation
of slaves, whilst in none of the great empires of Christian
Europe is domestic slavery tolerated, or would the public
spirit suffer human beings to be sold like brutes; and
throughout the vast dominions of England, comprising
about one-fifth of the human race, a law is in force,
that, as soon as any slave sets his foot on English
ground, that moment he becomes a free man. So different
has been the respective influence of Muhammadanism and
Christianity in regard to slavery; and all this is the
natural fruit of the |
|