|
principles and tendencies they respectively bring
to bear on social relations in general. It is true the
Qur'an contains some passages similar to those found
in tile Old Testament, in which humanity and even liberality
towards slaves are recommended; but even in this respect
there are one or two particulars which stamp the teaching
of the Qur'an as inferior even to that of the Torah.
The Qur'an expressly leaves the virtue of all female
slaves, even of the married ones, to the mercy of their
master, whilst the Torah gives no such license. It cannot
but be regarded as a great hardship and cruelty to the
female slaves to declare them unprotected in what every
right-minded woman prizes most, her feminine virtue.
That this is done by the Qur'an will be seen from the
following questions: 'The believers are continent, except
as regards their wives, or the slaves whom their right-hands
possess; for in respect of them they shall be blameless'
[Suratu'1-Mu'arij (lxx) 29-30]. Again 'Forbidden to
you are married women, except those who are in your
hands as slaves ' [Suratu'n-Nisa' (iv) 28]. So likewise,
whilst it was ordered in the Torah that every Hebrew
slave should only have to serve his master six years,
and in the seventh he should go out free (Exod. xxi.
2); and whilst it was further provided that any master
who killed his slave was to be 'surely punished' (Exod.
xxi. 20); and if he inflicted any bodily injury upon
any of them, he was bound to give |
|
|
them their liberty in return (Exod. xxi. 2b-7); there
is no such safeguard found in the Qur'an; and the result
is, that masters can exercise cruelties towards their
slaves in Muhammadan countries for which they would
have been punished by the law of Moses. It, then, is
a fact beyond contradiction, that slaves are less protected
by the Qur'anic than the Mosaic code; it is a fact that
slavery still exists all over the Muhammadan world,
and that in no single Muslim country has it ever been
abolished; and it is a fact that in the whole of Christian
Europe slavery is only known as a thing of the past,
and that every living man is free, whilst Christian
England, actuated by the spirit of the gospel, has conferred
the blessing of liberty upon all the millions formerly
kept in bondage throughout her immense possessions in
every part of the world. Hence every man of common sense
must perceive that, with regard to slaves and slavery,
Islam, so far from being more just, humane, and merciful
than Christianity, is quite the reverse, not even reaching
the Mosaic standard.
6. Polygamy and divorce.
This is the last point of comparison between the teaching
of the Old and New Testament which we have considered
above (see p. 28), and in which we have found the latter
superior to the former; for whilst the law of Moses
did not forbid polygamy by any legal enactment, and
expressly tolerated divorce, |
|