|
The normal idea of matrimony supposes a perfect union,
in which husband and wife mutually live for each other:
but if a man has several wives, all of whom have to
regard him as their only husband, and to bear him unswerving
fealty, how can he reciprocate this devotion, seeing
that he cannot belong wholly to more than one? In polygamy
there cannot be a perfect matrimonial alliance, or an
equal surrender of husband and wife to one another;
for whilst each wife is expected to devote herself wholly
to the husband, the husband, being only one, cannot
give himself wholly to each one of several wives, and
consequently he is not a true and real husband to any
of them. The union between husband and wife being thus
incomplete, how could we expect it to produce a united
and healthy family life? The house of a man living in
polygamy cannot form one united family at all, but as
many defective families as there are wives. Each wife
of a polygamist, with her children, has her own separate
family interests, differing from those of her husband,
and those of every one of his other wives. Hence the
common experience, to which even the harem of the Arabian
prophet itself proved no exception [see Suratu't-Tahrim
(lxvi) 1-5], that wherever there is more than one wife,
there must also be endless feuds and jealousies. 1
It is therefore not surprising, that, in spite of the
sanction of their
|
|
|
religion, comparatively few of the richer Muslims,
especially in Turkey, indulge in marrying more than
one wife, and the poor very rarely; a fact which clearly
proves that polygamy is an unnatural institution, unsuited
to the actual circumstances of human society. Nor can
it be denied that it is degrading to the female sex;
for it rests upon the admission that one woman is inadequate
to the duty and dignity of conjugal companionship, and
that a man consults his happiness more by having two,
three, or four wives. There can be little doubt, that
if women in Muhammadan countries were more enlightened
and educated, they would scorn to accept so degrading
a position. It is undeniable that Islam, in sanctioning
polygamy, departed at once from the practice of the
Christian world during the previous six hundred years,
and the normal law of the divine Creator; for nothing
is more clearly established by the statistical science
of modern times than that the primal law of the Creator,
ordaining one woman for one man, remains unaltered;
since it is found all over the world that the proportion
of male and female births is still about equal. It is
evident, then, that no provision has been made by the
God of nature for Muhammad's plurality of wives, and
that his precepts, and practice on this head are in
direct antagonism to natural and revealed law. Hence
it follows as a general result, in ordinary circumstances,
that where |
|