CHAPTER II.

MOHAMMED EXERCISING THE PROPHETIC MISSION
HE CLAIMED, OR HIS HISTORY DURING THE LAST
TWENTY-THREE YEARS OF HIS LIFE.

What history clearly places before us is the well-known fact that, when Mohammed died, he had virtually succeeded in making himself the paramount chief and sovereign ruler of the Arab nation. And what is no less notorious, is the other fact, that, about twenty years before his death, he had presented himself to his countrymen with the claims of a messenger of God, a bearer of new revelations, the founder, or at least restorer, of an absolutely true and final religion. He began his public career as a Prophet and finished his course as, in fact, a ruling Sovereign.

To us, in this present age, which distinguishes so widely between 'the things which are God's' and 'the things which are Caesar's,' there appears in this something glaringly inconsistent and anomalous. Hence it has happened in our days that Mohammed's public life was sometimes represented as broken up into two heterogeneous halves-the one, that of a sincere man and true prophet of God; the other, that of a base apostate and carnal worldling.1

In the original records of Mohammed's life we cannot discover proofs of such an apostasy. He is never represented as betraying the least apprehension that the connecting link between his earlier and his later public life might have been


1 The views expressed by Sir W. Muir in his different works on Mohammed belong to this category. See, e.g. his Life of Mahomet, vol. ii. chap. iii. In his last and shortest work entitled Mahomet and Islam, he asks, 'Whether, in fact, the eye (of Mohammed) being no longer single, the whole body did not become full of darkness?' (p. 25), and exclaims, 'How has the fine gold become dim!' (p. 129): thus concisely indicating his appreciation of the difference of Mohammed's character in the two great periods of his prophetic activity.
INWARD UNION OF MECCAN
& MEDINAN PERIODS.
73

a spiritual lapse. On the contrary, he and his followers recognised in his military exploits and political ascendency nothing less than the natural outcome and the due reward of his earlier labours and sufferings as a prophet. To Mohammed and the Mohammedans his public life from beginning to end is one congruous whole, which leaves room for no radical change of principles, but only for the development and maturing of what was originally aimed at and hoped for.

Therefore the historian of Mohammed's life seems bound, in order to do justice to his subject, to lay bare, if possible, this essential union, notwithstanding all the difference of outward appearances, and to give the most careful attention to all those historical records which may help him in explaining the intimate connection subsisting between the political and the religious, the worldly and the spiritual, throughout Mohammed's prophetic career. He must try to discover, from the materials transmitted to us, those traits and data which are calculated to demonstrate the inward connection and agreement of the different periods in Mohammed's life. He must seek to furnish historical proof that, as in his later period, when he ruled Arabia with the harshness of a military despot, he did so in the name of religion and by virtue of his prophetic character, so also, when he began his career as a religious reformer and apostle of God, he already entertained, more or less consciously, those secular and political designs which he afterwards realised. An historical view and psychological study of the subject must greatly enhance its claims to soundness and correctness, if it can produce in us the conviction, so natural in itself and so plainly entertained by the Moslem historians, that Mohammed became what he desired to become, and that he aimed from the first at what he obtained at last; and not, that the single-eyed, spiritually-minded prophet of the Meccan period rather suddenly, as if by accident, by the mere change of outward circumstances, turned into the cunning deceiver, the sensual worldling, of Medina.

Islam being evidently an attempted amalgam of God and the world, of religion and politics, the source from which it flowed cannot have been one of limpid purity. The prophet who instituted it, and whose impress it bears, surely cannot