|
BOOK II.
Mohammed viewed in the Moonshine of Tradition
THE object of the First Book was, to set forth Mohammed
in his true historical character, as, from the materials
and data transmitted to us, he can be conceived to have
lived and acted, to have been influenced by his surroundings,
and to have exercised an influence upon others. Our
historical information concerning him being derived
almost exclusively from his enthusiastic admirers and
implicit believers, the picture with which they have
furnished us is not the least likely to do injustice
to the actual man. It might possibly have had to be
drawn still more to his disadvantage, had the stream
of Mohammed's history flowed from purer and less partial
sources. It was a plain duty for the author, in availing
himself of the material at our disposal, to make use
of a due measure of critical discrimination, and to
put the reader on his guard against the exaggerations
of blindly uncritical narrators.
In this Second Book the author's duty is changed.
He no longer aims at placing before the reader an image
of the Arabian Prophet, as he actually lived in the
body; but he wishes, by mere literal quotations from
professed Mussulman writings, to illustrate how the
glowing imagination and devout admiration of the Moslem
believers have metamorphosed him, and enveloped the
genuine natural original in the fictitious halo of a
dazzling radiance and a supernatural glory.
There can be no doubt, that the first impulse to this
transfiguration of the eminently earthly Prophet into
the all, but in name, superhuman Apostle and transcendent
Favourite of God, was given by Mohammed himself. What |
|
|
DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN BOOK I. AND BOOK II. |
243 |
|
we have seen of him in the First Book must have sufficiently
convinced us that he was by no means given to the rationalistic
method of seeking to explain supernatural things by
natural causes; but that he was rather prone to raise
himself in the estimation of others, by imparting a
miraculous colouring to things perfectly natural. From
the moment he affirmed himself to be equal, nay superior,
to all the preceding prophets, as their chief and seal,
he was almost compelled also to claim ascendency over
them as the recipient of Divine favours. This he must
have found very difficult, especially with regard to
Jesus Christ; and it could not but draw him on to very
hazardous assertions.
His partisans soon understood how he wished to be
estimated by them, and that it was their interest to
please him by responding to his wishes. Once having
indorsed his pretension of being God's highest Apostle,
they became naturally disposed to attribute to him what
they fancied so transcendent a dignity should actually
comprise. They reasoned thus, if they reasoned at all,
'Mohammed is the last and greatest of the prophets;
and therefore it is but right and fitting that he should
possess, in a superlative degree, those gifts and favours
which distinguished former prophets.' In this way the
true dimensions of their prophet's figure imperceptibly
magnified themselves to them into gigantic proportions;
more especially after his death, when they looked at
him through the radiance of almost unexampled military
glory and undreamt of riches of spoil. The not unnatural
admiration of his successes soon degenerated into a
superstitious credulity, which accepted whatever was
told about him, with all the greater avidity, the more
extraordinary and fantastic it appeared. To the dazzled
vision of devout Moslems, a story possessed the highest
degree of probability, when it most tended to raise
the founder of their triumphant religion far above any
other messenger of God.
Hence we find that what is to correspond, in Mohammed,
to the 'signs and wonders' of former prophets, notably
of Jesus Christ, assumes such an offensively grotesque
and utterly incredible character. What an immense contrast
between the miracles of the Bible and the miracles of
Moslem |
|