470 |
HISTORICAL
POSITION OF MOHAMMEDANISM. |
[BK. III. |
|
his countrymen were already feeling, likewise not
without political aspirations. Accordingly he made his
start as a Reformer of the prevailing religion. Retaining
the national sanctuary, with its religious veneration
of a black stone, he accepted from the Monotheistic
religions the Faith in One God and the repudiation of
idols. He borrowed, particularly from Jewish sources,
much historic and religious information which, with
other enactments, he sought to palm off on the people
as direct revelations from heaven to himself, through
the angel Gabriel. In this sinister enterprise he was
materially aided by the hysterical, visionary constitution
of his nature, an inheritance from weakly parents, and
an open channel for impure and deceiving influences
from the realm of Darkness. Once presenting himself
to the people as a Prophet and religious Reformer, he
had necessarily to talk much about God and religion.
But it must not be forgotten that pious phraseology,
which has deceived so many, is not by itself a proof
of sincere spiritual piety, and that the language of
Canaan has often been heard from the lips of Philistines.
That Mohammed was not a spiritually quickened or regenerate
man, breathing the pure atmosphere of a 'worship in
spirit and in truth,' must inevitably be gathered from
his religion with its mechanical formalism of worship,
its wearisome repetition of prayers, its conception
of God as mainly the sovereign Lord and omnipotent Master,1
and
|
|
SEC. V.] |
ISLAM NECESSARILY ANTI-CHRISTIAN. |
471 |
|
with its perfunctory practice of dead works. The
religion concocted by Mohammed is properly that of the
unregenerate, natural man. It remains at an immeasurable
distance behind the lofty spirituality of the Gospel
and the loving communion with the 'Father in heaven'
to which it shows the way. The word which Jesus addressed
to the Jews becomes fully applicable here: 'Ye are from
below, I am from above' (John viii. 23). Mohammed, from
his low, earthly standing-point, could neither apprehend
the unique excellence of the character of Christ, nor
the real nature of His all-sufficient and all-comprehending
salvation.
Not want of opportunity, but want of sympathy and
compatibility, kept him aloof from the religion of Christ.
His first wife introduced him to her Christian cousin;
one of his later wives had embraced Christianity in
Abyssinia; and the most favoured of his concubines was
a Christian damsel from the Copts of Egypt. He was acquainted
with ascetic monks, and had dealings with learned Bishops
of the Orthodox Church. In those days the reading of
the Holy Scriptures in the public services of the Catholic
Church was already authoritatively enjoined and universally
practised if he had wished thoroughly to acquaint himself
with them he could easily have done so. But having no
adequate conception of the nature of sin and man's fallen
state, he also lacked the faculty of truly appreciating
the remedy for it, which was offered in the Gospel.
Unable and unwilling to recognise in Christ the Saviour
of man, and in Christianity the right way to God, Mohammed
dared to set himself up against Christ, as the last
and greatest of all God's Messengers, and to claim the
right for his new religion of replacing Christianity.
So it came to pass that Islamism, the only religion
starting up in broad Christian daylight, and in the
face of Christ, was essentially and from its birth not
a sort of imperfect or half-Christianity, a younger
brother and helpful ally, but a determined rival and
implacable foe. The Koran is a book not merely different
from the Gospel, but hostile and contradictory to it.
It is notorious that it categorically denies the great
truths upon which all Christianity reposes as its immovable
foundation, to wit, the Divine nature and Sonship of |
|