16 |
THE
ORIGIN OF ISLAM |
LECT |
|
really meant, to escape from his former
associations and determine his future policy. He mentions
his visit not as a proof of his activity, but as helping
to make clear the independence of his Christian convictions.
"I conferred not with flesh and blood; neither
went I up to Jerusalem, but I went away into Arabia;
and returned again to Damascus."
The Apostle Bartholomew is said in tradition to have
preached in India, and it is fairly generally conceded
that India in these traditions means, or at any rate
includes, the south of Arabia. But the traditions themselves
are regarded as too legendary to be accepted as furnishing
any historical information that can be relied on.
It would, however, take too long to examine
the various notices of Arab Christians and of Christianity
within the bounds of Arabia in the early centuries.
The sum of the matter seems to be that the Church gained
no really independent footing amongst the Arabs at all.
What Harnack says of the first three centuries remains
on the whole true down to the time of Muhammad "Churches
are only to be sought in those districts in which there
were citizens of mixed Arab, Greek, and Roman population,
where a higher form of culture was to be found".1
Pere Cheikho has lately undertaken to show that practically
the whole of Arabia was Christian in pre-Muhammadan
times, and has collected a multitude of references from
pre-Islamic poets and statements from Christian and
Moslem historians to show that many tribes were Christianised.
He |
|
|
I |
EASTERN
CHURCH AND ARABIA |
17 |
|
has succeeded in bringing together an
impressive amount of material. But it does not suffice
to show that Christianity had any deep hold upon the
inhabitants of the Arabian Peninsula proper. Harnack's
statement, that "there are no pre-Muhammadan translations
of the Bible into Arabic—and that is strong proof
that Christianity had not found any footing at all among
the Arabs in early times", is fairly conclusive.
It is borne out by study of conditions at a later period.
The language of Christianity in the East was Aramaic
(or Syriac), and there is no evidence of a Christian
Church using Arabic in its services. The nature of Muhammad's
own mission, which was to be the Prophet of his own
people, and to give to them a Holy Book in their own
language, is confirmation of that point of view. What
we have to do with is not a native Arab Church, or any
deep impression of Christianity upon the Arab tribes,
though some of them were Christian in name, but rather
with Christian Churches on the confines of Arabia exercising
upon the ruder inhabitants of the Peninsula a certain
amount of influence and attraction. In this way a certain
knowledge of Christianity must have been diffused throughout
Arabia.
This influence of Christianity upon Arabia
came principally from three centres, viz. Syria in the
north-west, Mesopotamia in the north-east, and Abyssinia
in the west, which may have exercised its influence
directly across the Red Sea, but did so principally,
as we shall see, by way of Yaman in the south, which
was for a time subject to an Abyssinian dynasty. |
|