24 |
THE
ORIGIN OF ISLAM |
LECT. |
|
point of dissolution, revived again under Heraclius,
who after an arduous but successful war recovered from
Persia the lost provinces. By that time, however (A.D.
629), the Prophet of Medina was already causing trouble
on the frontiers of Arabia. Heraclius' attempt to regulate
Church matters in Syria and the East had only time to
show that the breach was irreconcilable. When the Moslem
outburst came a few years later it found the Roman Empire
exhausted by a long and desperate struggle, the buffer-state
by which it had maintained its influence in Arabia destroyed,
and the bulk of the Syrian Arabs, whatever may have
been the sincerity of their Monophysite belief, at any
rate opposed to the official orthodoxy of Byzantium.
MESOPOTAMIA
To the north-east of the peninsula of Arabia lay another
Christian district, partly within the Roman Empire,
but principally within the bounds of Persian dominion.
A good deal of legend hangs around the introduction
of Christianity to Edessa and the country of the Euphrates
and the Tigris. But we can safely say that by the end
of the third century there was a flourishing Church
at Edessa, and that Christianity had already spread
down the Euphrates valley and across the Tigris.1 There
were churches at Nisibis, Arbela, Junde-shapur, Kashkar,
and at Seleucia-Ctesiphon, the winter capital of the
Persian kings, which ultimately became the seat of the
Katholikos or |
|
|
I |
EASTERN
CHURCH AND ARABIA |
25 |
|
Patriarch of the Nestorian Church. More than once
the Church within the Persian Empire had to suffer bitter
persecution. Sometimes impelled by suspicion of sympathy
between its Christian subjects and the rival Empire
of Rome, sometimes stirred by the jealousy of the priests
of the Magian religion, and sometimes from mere whim,
the Persian Government raged cruelly against it. Nor
was it altogether without its doctrinal troubles. But
the Syrian type of thought maintained itself, except
in Edessa, which was in Roman territory, and from which
the supporters of the "two-nature" view of
the Person of Christ were violently driven. Within the
Persian Empire this type of doctrine prevailed, and
taking its name from the deposed patriarch of Constantinople,
the Church became definitely Nestorian. This separation
in doctrine from the Church of the Roman Empire had
at least the advantage of easing to some extent the
relations of the Christians with the Persian authorities.
In spite of its troubles the Church in those regions
had a worthy history. By the end of the sixth century
it had extended and deepened its hold so that probably
no town of any size remained which had not its church
and its bishop.
To what extent the people thus converted to Christianity
were Arabs it is impossible to say. The situation here
as regards relations between the settled and the nomad
population was no doubt much the same as in Syria, and
it seems reasonable to suppose that a proportion of
the Christians of Mesopotamia were Arabs. Christianity
also found its way into the actual territory |
|