34 |
THE
ORIGIN OF ISLAM |
LECT. |
|
sense in which the name India is used by Greek and
Latin writers.1 We are hardly ever sure whether
it refers to India proper or to South Arabia, to Abyssinia,
or to some other part of the African or Asiatic coast.
Thus we have the tradition given by Eusebius 2
that Bartholomew had preached the gospel in India and
had left there the Gospel of Matthew in Hebrew, which
was still in existence in the time of Pantænus. This
may possibly refer to South Arabia. For there were certainly
in the first Christian century, and even many centuries
earlier, frequent communications of commercial and other
kinds between that part of the world and Palestine.
Then there is the legend of Phemion given by Tabari,3
according to which an ascetic of that name wandering
in Syria was captured by an Arab caravan and carried
to Najran in South Arabia. The earliest really historical
account of Christianity in South Arabia, however, has
reference to the time at which Frumentius was bishop
in Abyssinia. We learn from various sources 4
that in A.D. 356 Constantius sent an embassy to South
Arabia. The leader of it was Theophilus, sometimes further
designated as "the Indian". He is said to
have belonged to the island of Dibu, which has been
until recently identified as lying at the mouth of the
Indus. |
|
|
II |
CHRISTIANITY
IN ARABIA |
35 |
|
Glaser,1 however, identifies it with an
island on the Arabian coast of the Red Sea near Anfuda.
If this be correct it would help to explain why Theophilus
was sent on this embassy. He would be practically a
native of the country to which it was directed. Coming
as a hostage to the Empire in the reign of Constantine,
Theophilus had embraced Christianity, adopted the ascetic
life, and had been made deacon by Eusebius. Having undertaken
the embassy he was invested by his own party (i.e. the
Arians) with episcopal dignity. The embassy was lavishly
fitted out by Constantius, and rich gifts, including
two hundred Cappadocian horses, were sent to the king
of the Homeritæ. The result is said to have been that
the latter adopted Christianity and built three churches
out of his own revenues. It is unlikely that the emperor
expended so much on a purely religious mission, though
it probably had some connection with the Arian and Athanasian
disputes which were at that time troubling the Church.
Both parties were seeking to extend their influence,
and Theophilus is said to have had the further commission
to go to Axum and move for the expulsion of Frumentius,
the bishop there, who belonged to the Athanasian party.
But behind this the real mainspring of the anxiety to
introduce Christianity into both Abyssinia and South
Arabia lay in international politics and the rivalry
between the Roman and the Persian Empires. The adoption
of Christianity meant an extension of the influence
of Rome. South Arabia was, however, open to the influence
of Persia, |
|
|