178 |
THE
ORIGIN OF ISLAM |
LECT. |
|
they should be made slaves, so that they may have
time to consider the acceptance of Islam. In practice
indeed Islam has had to modify that attitude, and tolerate
others besides People of the Book. But that has been
and is its spirit towards idolatry.
The People of the Book, however, were not to be forced
to change their religion. Theoretically they were to
be fought and reduced to subjection. The Qur'an lays
down the precept: "Fight against those who do
not believe in God, nor in the Last Day, do not forbid
what God and his Apostle forbid, nor practise the true
religion, from among those who have been given the Book,
until they pay the Jizya out of hand, being submissive"
(ix. v. 29) — a verse which is capable of various interpretations.
But it was interpreted to mean that Jews and Christians
generally were to be reduced to subjection. But if they
agreed to pay the tribute (Jizya) they were to
be tolerated in their religion. The Prophet himself
had set the example in his dealings with the Christians
of Najran in South Arabia. 1 An embassy from that town
visited him in Medina. They refused to accept Islam,
but after some negotiation they agreed to pay tribute
(2000 garments, each of the value of an ounce of gold,
in the year), and in return received from him a written
guarantee: "The people of Najran and their dependents
enjoy the protection of God and Muhammad, for their
life, their religion, their land, and property, for
their churches and the practice of their religion —
no bishop or monk or waqif will be |
|
|
VI |
CHRISTIANS
AT ARAB CONQUEST |
179 |
|
forced to give up his position — and for all that
is in their hand, little or much, provided it be not
the product of usury or blood-money from heathen times."
There are other examples of similar conditions laid
down by the Prophet for Christians in Arabia.
At the conquest the Christians were dealt with on similar
lines. If they agreed to live peaceably under Moslem
rule they paid the Jizya and the Kharaj
for the conquered land which remained in their hand.
Probably to begin with the Jizya and Kharaj
were not clearly distinguished. A town or district simply
paid a lump sum as tribute, the whole being designated
Jizya (so Wellhausen conjectures in explanation
of troubles which afterwards arose). But according to
Moslem Law, as it afterwards took shape, the Jizya
was a poll-tax levied at so much per head upon the adult
male population (women and children and imbeciles not
being reckoned), while the Kharaj was levied
on the produce of the land. In return for these payments
the non-Moslem population were entitled to protection
so far as the Moslem armies could afford it, not being
required to serve in military expeditions; and they
were not interfered with in the practice of their religion.
The law as later developed imposed certain restrictions,
some of which are found already in early capitulations,
as, e.g. that new churches should not be built,
that the use of bells should be discontinued, and that
religious practices should not be publicly obtruded;
that the Dhimmis (as the non-Moslems were called)
should be distinguished in dress and in the cut of |
|