182 |
THE
ORIGIN OF ISLAM |
LECT. |
|
"In Arabia there shall be but one religion"
is reported by Tradition as a word of the dying Prophet,
and he himself had certainly given example by his expulsion
of the Jews from Medina. Probably, however, no great
measures of expulsion were necessary in the time of
Omar. The only definite case mentioned is that of the
Christians of Najran, consecrated to Christianity though
that district was by the persecution suffered under
Dhu Nuwas. Lands were given them in exchange elsewhere.
Some migrated to Syria, but the greater part settled
in the vicinity of Kufa.1
That seems, however, to have been an exception. The
Arabs within the Peninsula seem to have gone over from
Christianity to Islam without much hesitation or regret.
The same applies very largely to the Arabs of Syria.
The House of Ghassan, long the bulwark of the Roman
Empire and of Christianity on the Syrian border, adopted
Islam almost at once. "They were Lords in the days
of Ignorance and Stars in Islam."2 In
the Euphrates district attachment to Christianity seems
to have been stronger. We hear of several nomad tribes
which remained Christian. In fact there was a Bishop
of the nomad Arabs a considerable time after the Arab
conquest, which shows that the defection was not complete.
Still, on the whole, it seems to be true that the nomad
Arabs, both within the Peninsula and on its borders,
went over to Islam very easily, especially when the
success of its |
|
|
VI |
CHRISTIANS
AT ARAB CONQUEST |
183 |
|
arms began to appear. After the great victory of
Qadisiyyah, some of the Christian Arab tribes came to
Sa'd, the victorious general, and said, "The tribes
which at first embraced Islam were wiser than we. Now
that Rustam hath been slain all will accept the new
belief." So there came over many tribes in a body
and made profession of the faith.1 The attachment
even of the nominally Christian tribes to that faith
had probably never been very deep, and they could have
had but a very superficial understanding of it. Indeed,
what interest could the abstruse questions of Christology,
about which the Eastern Church had been kept in a ferment
for centuries, have had for them? The formulæ of doctrine
could at most have been for the ordinary populations
even of the settled countries little more than slogans
of party warfare; if they were not also symbols of national
spirit protesting against imperial rule under the form
of the Orthodox Faith.
Now, at any rate to the Arabs, had come a stronger
call of nationality. Religiously — if they were religiously
inclined — Islam probably gave them all that they required.
It was Monotheistic, and it reformed with a strong hand
the worst moral abuses of Paganism. In place of the
abstruse speculations as to the nature of God and the
relation of the divine to the human with which the attention
of the Church had been so largely taken up in its Trinitarian
and Christological controversies, Islam harked back
to the idea of a God of power and of moral will, express- |
|
|