| 
|  |  | 
of Babylon are shown in this primeval story to have held that Ishtar, that is 
Zohra, ascended on high, — exactly as is told us in Muslim tradition, as also in 
the Jewish commentaries.
 |  | 
Now if we search for the Source of the above tale, we shall no doubt find it in 
what the Talmud says of the angels associating with women, in its commentary on 
the two verses in Genesis quoted below.1 Speaking of the second 
verse, a Jewish commentator gives us the following interpretation: — "It was 
Shamhazai and Uzziel who in those days came down from heaven."  Hence we 
see that the whole imaginative tale has come out of the mistake of this and 
other ignorant commentators. For the word giant, as shown below, was 
misconstrued by them to signify not those who tyrannically "fell" on the poor 
people around them, but angels who "came down, or fell, from heaven."2 
And this unhappy mistake has led to the spread of the strange idol-worship just 
narrated. Nor was there any apparent reason for the mistake; since in the Targum 
we find the name (Nefîlîm) explained in its right and natural sense as |  | 
 |  | 
|  |  | 
"giants." But by and by the Jews came to love the wild tales that spread abroad; 
and so in a counterfeit book ascribed to Enoch, we are told that 200 angels 
under Samyaza (i.e. Shamhazai) came down from the heavens to commit adultery on 
the earth, as we read:—
 |  | 
The angels of heaven having seen the daughters of men, fell in love with them, 
and said to one another, Let us take for ourselves these women, the daughters of 
mankind, and beget children for ourselves. And Samyaza, who was their chief, 
said ....Azaziel taught men to make swords, daggers, and shields, and taught 
them to wear breastplates. And for the women they made ornaments of kinds, 
bracelets, jewels, collyrium to beautify their eyelids, lovely stones of great 
price, dresses of beautiful colours, and current money.
 |  | 
Let it be remembered also that we have mention of this in the Qur'an:—  Men 
learned from these two (Hârût and Mârût) that by which to cause a 
division between a man and his wife; but they did not injure any one thereby 
excepting by leave of God; and they learned that which would hurt them and not 
profit them.1
This is similar to what we have seen above in the Midrash Yalkut, where we are 
told that Azael embellished the daughters of men with ornaments to make them 
lovely and attractive.
 |  | 
But enough has been said to show that the story of Hârût and Mârût, as we find 
it in the Qur'an and Muslim books, has been derived from Jewish sources.
 |  | 
Fifth.  A few other things taken by Islam from the Jews. — If time 
permitted, we could easily tell of many other narratives in the Qur'an, not in 
our Scripture |  | 
 |  |