462 |
HISTORICAL
POSITION OF MOHAMMEDANISM. |
[BK. III. |
|
in heaven, and things on earth, and things under
the earth; and that every tongue should confess that
Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father'
(Phil. ii. 9-11).
III.— The Heathenism of Rome diabolically
opposed Christianity in its Congregational or Ecclesiastical
Manifestation.
The second form in which Christianity manifested
and established itself in the world was the congregational
or ecclesiastical. It naturally developed from
the personal stage and retained it within itself. The
individual Christians, attracted and moulded as they
all are by Christ, are related to each other like the
radii of a common centre. They all trace their
new life to Him as its source, and recognise in Him
the type and regulating law of its development and manifestation.
The same bond of union which connects them with their
spiritual Head also joins them to one another, as living
members of one spiritual body. 'Whosoever loveth him
that begat, loveth him also that is begotten of him'
(I John v. 1). Christianity is essentially a uniting,
communion-forming principle: its natural outcome are
religious communities, Churches.
During the lifetime of Christ, and for a number of
years after His death, His disciples were only united
by the inward tie of faith and love, but outwardly continued
members of the Jewish community. In Antioch they were
first recognised as a distinct denomination, that of
'Christians' (Acts xi. 26). At the close of the first
century from the birth of Christ, whole portions of
the Roman empire were dotted with congregations of Christians;
and St. John, in his old age, was directed to write
letters to the seven most celebrated and representative
Churches of Asia Minor (Rev. i. 11).
It is notorious how these youthful and rapidly multiplying
Christian communities were persecuted for nearly 300
years; and how long the Roman empire, so tolerant in
matters of religion generally, treated Christianity
as a , 'religio illicita,' and sought to prevent
its propagation and profession by all the rigour of
its laws and the whole weight of its secular force.
Lactantius, a Christian historian of that time, thus
refers to |
|
SEC. III.] |
PAGAN ROME AND CHRISTIANITY. |
463 |
|
the sad drama: 'Had I the power of language a hundredfold,
still I could not relate all the crimes that were committed,
nor recount all the torments which the ingenuity of
rulers devised against unnumbered multitudes of innocent
Christians.' Eusebius, another historian of the same
period, in recording the effects of the persecution
by the Emperor Diocletian in the single Province of
Egypt, where churches had greatly multiplied, declares
that 70,000 Christians had to suffer imprisonment, slavery,
and banishment, that 140,000 died the death of martyrs,
and that sometimes so many were beheaded in a single
day, that the executioners became weary of their butcheries,
and their instruments were blunted. By such inhuman
means Heathenism, the State-religion of Rome, strove
to rid itself of what it felt to be a formidable rival,
full of youthful ardour and energy.
No crimes could be carried home to the Christians
in their religious assemblies, as their heathen adversaries
had so often attempted to do; but the real cause of
all this hatred and enmity is already referred to in
Pliny's celebrated letter to the Emperor Trajan, where
he informed his Imperial master that all over the Province
of Bithynia, of which he was the Procurator, the public
temples and altars were deserted, and there remained
but few who brought offerings to the idols and their
priests. Now if St. Paul speaks truly 'that the things
which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to demons
and not to God' (1 Cor. x. 20), then the interests of
Idolatry and the interests of the spiritual powers of
Darkness, which formed the background of Idolatry, were
virtually identical. The cause threatened and the cause
to be defended were a common cause. Demoniacal inspirations
and impulses can therefore hardly have been wanting
in the cruel persecutions against the rising Christian
Church, by which the Idolaters of the Roman empire so
pertinaciously tried to uphold their ancestral religion.
The ancient Fathers, Justin Martyr, Tertullian, and
others, were quite consistent in tracing the origin
of these atrocious persecutions back to that source.
But, as every one can easily understand, it does not
follow from this, that the powers of Darkness must have
equally regarded it as their interest, some centuries
later, to |
|