464 |
HISTORICAL
POSITION OF MOHAMMEDANISM. |
[BK. III. |
|
uphold and defend Idolatry in Arabia. In the Roman
empire the Heathen religion was threatened by the Kingdom
of God, under the form of Christianity; in Arabia only
by the dominion of Islam. It is notorious that Islam,
under the form of a rigid Monotheism, has retained and
legalised the essentials of Heathenism, such as: a self-chosen
earthly sanctuary, or House of God (beit-Ullak);
ritual ceremonies, in the stead of a worship in spirit
and in truth; fictitious revelations; a false Prophet
and unqualified Mediator; and dispensation from the
necessity of a spiritual regeneration in heart and life.
Christianity called the Heathens out of their religious
night into the bright daylight of the Sun of righteousness
and truth. Islam transferred them from the starlight
night into the moonlight night. In the latter case their
change was a comparatively slight one, and only disposed
them still more fatally to confound night with day,
and to prefer darkness to light.
The same Satanic influence, which had moved the Jewish
priests and elders to crucify the Master and to persecute
the Disciples, also stirred up the whole Roman empire
to scatter and destroy the rising Church. For by the
truth they taught, and by the holy love they practised,
the Christians were a standing rebuke to the errors
and vices, so largely prevalent everywhere around them,
and so genial an element for the sinister influence
of the powers of Darkness. In the Apocalyptic epistle
to the Angel of the Church of Smyrna it is expressly
written, 'Behold, the devil is about to cast some of
you into prison, that ye may be tried; and ye shall
have tribulation ten days' (Rev. ii. 10). The visible
persecutors and actual imprisoners, of course, were
the Roman magistrates and soldiers: but Holy Scripture,
which looks through the outward appearance to the inward
essence of things, makes the startling announcement,
'The devil will cast some of you into prison.'
So certain it is, that the sanguinary persecutions of
the Christian Church by the Pagan empire of Rome had
their deepest spring in the infernal spheres of Darkness.
But Light is destined to triumph over Darkness, and
Good to prevail against Evil. Therefore, as the heavenly
faith and love of the Christians survived the persecution
of a Jewish |
|
SEC. III.] |
CHRISTIANITY
CHRISTIANISES NATIONS. |
465 |
|
fanaticism, so they also gained the victory over
the Roman prison, fire, and sword. The 'religio illicita,'
the persecuted Church, became a privileged institution,
a protected Church-Establishment. New Rome came forth
from Old Rome. Christianity superseded Paganism as the
'Religion of the State.' The laws of the Empire were
gradually reformed in a Christian direction, and its
public institutions increasingly harmonised with the
word of God. The Pontifex maximus of a bygone
superstition was replaced by the Christian Emperor
of a new and higher order of things. The mighty people
of Rome became the first Christian Nation.
IV.— Islamism, a compound of Jewish
fanaticism and Roman despotism, likewise opposed Christianity,
but more especially in its National and Political Manifestation.
In the way described, Christianity had now advanced
to the third of the ever-widening circles of
its healthful life and influence: from the personal,
through the ecclesiastical, to the national.
Its progress from one of these stages to the other was
a perfectly natural and necessary one, being nothing
more than the organic unfolding of its inward life and
the fuller realisation of its destiny. Christ's parting
injunction to His Apostles was, 'Go ye, and make disciples
of all the nations' (Matt. xxviii. 19). He claims the
whole man, and all men. His rich storehouse of blessings
is intended for the Individual, the Church, and the
Nation.
As soon as a nation accepts Christianity for its religion,
it, in a sense, becomes a Christian nation. From
that moment it is no less incumbent upon it to Christianise
its institutions, laws, habits, and entire national
life, than an individual Christian is bound to lead
a Christian life. But as in this present world of development
everything is imperfect, and the true ideal is only
pursued, never completely overtaken, we neither find
the Christian individuals perfect, nor the Christian
churches immaculate, If, therefore, we see Christian
life and influence, in its widest, its national, circle
even still more extenuated and marred,— this must not
make us blind to what is actually Christian, or induce
us |
|